‍

The Path to Honouring God — or Life — is Conditional Expression

In a world that permits, embraces and celebrates the rampant exploitation of God, it should come as no surprise that questions are often raised around the nature of God’s love.

You will not need to look far to find someone parading a worldly faith, by explaining God’s love for us.

How he loves.

Why he loves.

And the nature of his love.

Of course, unless they are sharing information that came directly from God, all they are doing is participating in the world’s exploitation of God.

What they offer is an unsolicited opinion.

A personal explanation of ‘God’ that relates exclusively to their tailored notion of God.

They are sharing something they believe, not something God has shared about himself.

What they offer has nothing to do with God’s understanding of himself, making it no more than a non-consensual misrepresentation of him.

And what we do know about God as fact, is that he despised those who explained him without knowing him.

And why wouldn’t he.

When people exploit God in this way it means the world comes to understand the nature and form of God, not from God himself, but from weasels who value their own personal ideas about God above his own Word, and who steal from him a right that can only belong to him.

The right to speak for himself and share what he wants to share with the world, when he wants to share it.

It tampers with, and draws the world’s focus away from, God’s own plan for revelation.

The one Jesus asked those who loved and trusted him to be watchful for.

No one honours, loves or trusts God when they ordain themselves a middleman between God and the world.

A middleman is defined as one who buys goods from a producer and then sells them on to others.

When someone explains, reimagines or interprets God’s Word and actions in a way that suits them, or gives their opinion on God they become the middleman.

They are selling their ‘goods’ — their take on God and his sacred Word — on to consumers.

Only their ‘goods’ did not come through an honourable or fair trade.

They have no legitimate claim to the ‘goods’ they offer in the first place.

The source of the product they offer has given neither its blessing nor consent for these shonky dealers to trade what is not theirs to trade.

What they offer is stolen goods.

And anyone who ‘buys’ what these thieves have to offer, is purchasing — and taking possession of — stolen goods.

God is violated and exploited by those who do this — whom he has described as ‘Godrobbers’ — and those who call themselves faithful but lap up these thefts.

Some even calling what they hear ‘truth’.

That is how lowly God is regarded by our world.

People cheer, adore and support those who steal from God while the one true God suffers more than ever before.

Autonomy over God’s Word can only belong to one being.

But that’s what the worldly faithful do to God.

They do things to God they would never allow happen to themselves or those they love. At least not without a fight.

But when it comes to God’s dignity and life, they are the perpetrators of non-consensual abuse and exploitation.

The worldly faith does not seek to learn about God from God.

It either seeks to teach what it has no right to teach or falls at the feet of such teachers.

A worldly faith robs God of his right to sole authority over the things he wants the world to know and understand about him.

When people speak about God in any way without his blessing, and without knowing him, he loses control of the narrative of what people know and understand about him.

He is not who he says he is.

He becomes whatever people want him to be.

And should anyone trust a Godrobber they will be more influenced by the exploitation and misrepresentation of God when it comes to knowing God, than by God himself.

When people do this, those who listen to them do not learn about God from God’s perspective.

They are learning about an exploitative fetishization of God, offered by someone who believes the knowledge God has shared with us is so inadequate, lowly and incomplete and their opinion so elevated in comparison the world cannot possibly know ‘God’ without their explanations.

Which can also be called an exploitation.

And are despised by God.

Ask someone when they ‘explain’ or give their opinion on God if they are directly quoting God.

Or if they have God’s blessing to influence collective thought about God in the way that they are.

If they answer ‘no’ then whatever escapes their lips has zero credibility.

And zero substance.

They are the goat.

They do not offer a path to God, but a goat track to their own perversions of God.

A path of exploitation and betrayal — and if anyone is on such a path today, they are on that path at the time of God’s revelation.

When God spoke for himself, they will be known for worshipping and following the goats who instead of being watchful, alert and prepared for God as Jesus asked, chose to mould God into a ‘god’ of their choice.

The only truth that lies in the things they have to say, is that what has been expressed is a self-serving misrepresentation of God, that violates, desecrates and exploits his Word.

And know that what they say robs God of the sole right to sovereignty and authority over anything our world comes to learn, know and understand about him.

God’s right to reveal the things he wants to reveal, as he wants to reveal them, is stolen from him.

Yes!

God has revealed his true nature and form to the world.

He has said who he says he is. And he has said who we are to him.

But that is not what a world like ours wants.

If God speaks for himself, we can’t exploit him anymore.

And if God becomes the known expert on himself, then there is no need for the ‘experts’ and ‘authorities’ who do so well out of God.

We will no longer be able to harvest significance and importance in an abusive world for our misrepresentations and exploitations of God.

And those who stand on his shoulders to be seen by our world, will become the enemy of God’s own Word.

The competition.

Our world has not honoured God. It uses and exploits him.

And the worldly faith participates wholeheartedly in that exploitation.

How many people have carved out a name for themselves in an obscene and abusive world through their exploitation of God?

Jump on the Medium writing platform and you will see there that God is treated like a prostitute.

I mean no offence and cast no judgement on those who — with consent — choose to offer their body for income.

Our world leads many of us to places we might prefer not to go.

Today, often as a matter of survival.

None of us are so perfect in the expression of our lives that we get to sit in judgement of another.

Of course, when woman, children and others have their sacred bodies and lives trafficked without their blessing and consent — when they are exploited and forced into situations against their wishes — it is a different matter.

Abuses and exploitations such as these are a desecration of their human dignity and their right to bodily autonomy.

It is this type of prostitution that is forced upon God by online publishing platforms such as Medium who create a platform for their writers to misrepresent God.

God does not speak for himself when he is not speaking for himself.

God’s right to autonomy and sovereignty over his Life and Word and the things our world comes to know about him are not respected there.

If God himself has not offered the explanation or opinion we are hearing, then he has been exploited and abused.

His Word has been trafficked without his blessing and consent.

His Word has been hijacked without his blessing and consent.

Someone has prostituted God’s Word.

Oh I can hear the defence now.

‘I was just trying to honour God. I was serving him!’

By explaining the personal ‘god’ they want the world to know?

By entering their own personally tailored notion of ‘God’ in an obscene ‘my god is better than your god’ competition?

These defences are like a pimp saying they are just trying to honour the child they are offering up for abuse.

Our world has made itself a red-light district of personal gods where God becomes whatever we want him to be.

If it has not come directly from God it is a misrepresentation.

And an exploitation.

Every time someone offers a personal notion of God to the world, a false god — a ‘Godstitute’ — has been born.

And a violation of God has taken place.

That is the truth.

A statement of fact.

Those who support these desecrations of God are embracing, encouraging and celebrating the desecration of God.

This is not a path to honouring God.

Honouring God — and having faith in God — can only be expressed by honouring God and having faith in God.

And faith in God can only be established on the things we have come to know from him.

As soon as we step outside the ‘knowledge’ that comes from God and embrace the misrepresentations that are the knowledge that comes from those who have placed themselves on God’s shoulders, faith in God ceases to exists.

As does our love.

Respect.

And trust.

Someone who loves God, trusts God and seeks only to honour God as he has asked to be honoured, would not participate in, or embrace, the worldly exploitation of him .

What we do know from God, with the simplicity and clarity a child could understand is how God expected us to express our love.

And, in the same way, how to prove to him that we love him, or have loved him, as he asked to be loved. .

And not some perverse substitute — a ‘Godstitute’ — designed by those who thought it their place to define or explain him.

Not as he wished to be defined or explained.

But as they wanted him to be defined and explained.

They wanted the world to know their God.

Those with a worldly faith — because many are driven by humanity’s greatest mental illness which is the need to be seen as special in whatever way they need to be seen as special — preferred being seen as experts and authorities on God, over being what he asked us to be.

They do not place themselves at God’s feet.

They place themselves on God’s shoulders.

Did God not make those things he needed us to know — his Word and Laws of Consent made up of the expressions, and behaviours he needed from us — clear enough?

How much simpler could he have made his instructions on how to care for his Life?

He told us to put conditions and expressions on our demands if we were to honour him.

In doing this one embodies the way of conditional expression.

But one does not live with conditional expression because of threats and fear of punishment.

One lives with conditional expression because they love God.

Conditional expression is the way of life sourced in an unconditional love for God.

And one who truly loved God and knew the only way to prove this love was to be what God asked us to be, would never argue our behaviour was not important.

They would take God at his Word.

Not the word of those bold enough to betray him by inviting the world to embrace a ‘Godstitute’ of their own design.

If one loved, trusted and respected God — or believed him real — they would never dismiss the instructions and guidelines he handed down as anything other than God establishing consent.

Anyone who educates the world that God’s Laws of Consent — His Word — are anything less, is like one who claims that even though someone has established consent for how they expected their body to be treated, it is still okay to assault them.

‘They weren’t serious. They didn’t really mean ‘no’. They will love us all anyway. Go ahead and rape them to your hearts content. They don’t mind’.

This would be a gross misrepresentation of the truth.

And this person would suffer.

This is what those who misrepresent God, do to God.

They steal an authority that can only belong to God and then translate his own Word and testimony into a twisted and diluted form that turns God into whatever they want him to be.

God’s Word is no longer understood from God’s perspective.

But from the perspective of one who is prepared to misrepresent and exploit him in the first place.

They portray God as thinking and behaving as they want God to think and behave.

They take the place of God.

They gaslight God and educate the world on their self-serving lies.

They stand on God’s shoulders to be seen as wise, while, in reality, our world of abuse continues to rape and violate his body and life.

All while he speaks for himself.

God’s Word has returned.

The Word of God, now the Word of Life.

A revenant.

Come to hunt and haunt those who had claimed an unsolicited and self-serving authority over that Word, along with the worldly princes who led our world’s assault on God’s dignity, body and life.

This is true because the Life our world abused — without consent and against the wishes and will of Life — belongs to God.

God’s revelation has reduced the Medium ‘faithful’ to nothing more than an online community of vultures and pimps who exploit God and ravage his dignity, Word and Life in his greatest hour of need.

And they built this online mecca of abuse at the time for which Jesus asked them to be watchful.

When God defined himself as he is.

The Medium faithful claim to love Jesus, but they bet against him.

They didn’t trust him.

Writers there speak of mystery when God is speaking of fact.

They warn, ‘do not trust one who says they speak on behalf of God’.

But invite the world to trust their misrepresentations and exploitations.

The world is violating God while they are violating his Word.

That is their true legacy when it comes to God.

And that legacy is now eternal.

It cannot be changed because it is happening as I write.

Just as no murderer or rapist can ever take back or undo their murder or assault, every time a Medium writer hit the ‘publish’ button having written of things that did not come from God, they identified themselves as one who is misrepresenting and exploiting him.

It does not matter what history says.

These things have happened because they have happened.

Medium writers exploited God while God suffered.

They exploited Life, while Life suffered.

They spoke for God without permission when he was speaking for himself.

And they can say, ‘But God, I did not know!’

To which he has already replied, ‘That is the only truth you have shared!’

You did not know.

Because I had not spoken to you.

You did not know because I had not made myself known to you.

I did not commission you to do anything other than live a life that honoured me.

With humility and anonymity.

For me.

What you have done is for you.

Tell me now — what was so complex about how I asked you to live? Which of my laws of consent did I make so complex it needed further explanation from one who did not know me, and so did not know why I made those laws?

Why does a woman or child say ‘no’ to being violated?

Know their reasons and you know mine.

No one had to know my true nature and form to live a life of conditional expression.

How could one say they love me and then speak on my behalf without my blessing?

And of things that are not true?

You loved what you stole from me.

And while you swim in the praise and adoration of those who embraced your betrayals and exploitations, I suffer.

I Am the Life your world abuses.

And you cash in on me while I suffer.

My own Word is here.

I fight against you for my own right to be heard.

You serve yourselves, not me.

You feast on my dignity, Life and Word with your misrepresentations and exploitations.

What you have offered me is not love.

Not trust.

Not respect.

And not faith.

You offer me betrayal and exploitation.

No matter what you declare to the world of abuse you seek to impress.

There is nothing impressive about stealing an authority, that can be only mine. And nothing honourable about speaking about me when I am speaking about myself.

To me, you are who you are.

One who used me.

One who violated me.

One who thought so lowly of my own Word and testimony that you placed yourself above it, so you could pretend you were one who knows me better than I know myself.

If I did not ask anyone to say something about me, or tell them what that something is, then they have betrayed me.

They have taken out of my hands and out of my control the things I want the world to know about me.

They educate the world on what they want me to be.

They offer exploitation.

Not truth.

Love and embrace such a person and you have loved and embraced one who has exploited me.’

What is the difference between me and your most trusted and loved Medium writer? The one you follow, clap and support?

They speak on their own authority.

They seek to honour themselves.

They write things about God that have not come from God.

They attempt to steer collective thought away from God and towards their idea of God.

They misrepresent and exploit God.

I do none of these things.

Love them and you do not love God.

Hate what I have to say about God — or Life — and you hate what God has to say about himself.

Reject what I have to say, and you reject God or Life’s own Word and testimony.

This is the truth.

And so it is.

Amen.

Medium’s rampant misrepresentation and exploitation of God has featured in four out of the ten Books of Conditional Expression.

First, it appeared briefly in ’22 Days of God and the Fight for Life’. Here, God — or Life — has made it known he despises Medium.

And why wouldn’t he.

There, control over what the world ‘knows’ and ‘understands’ about him is taken out of his hands and placed in the hands of those who would position their personal notions of God, above God and his right to educate the world on who or what he is himself.

Medium and its writers then featured more heavily in ‘The Road to Easter’.

Their exploitation of God is addressed specifically.

And then in ‘Contra Mundum: God Against the World’, one particular Medium writer has been identied as the face of the worldly faith.

And it will feature again in ‘Conditional Expression and the God who is Life’.

‍

‍